[Talk-at] Fwd: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC: Via ferrata simplified
egil
egil at riseup.net
Tue Sep 4 10:01:59 UTC 2018
Hallo
Ich habe von Richard gehört, dass einige von Ihnen vielleicht daran
interessiert sind, Vorschläge für Klettersteig-Tags zu diskutieren.
Es gibt jetzt zwei konkurrierende Vorschläge, siehe unten.
Grüße
Egil / pangoSE, Schweden
-------- Vidarebefordrat meddelande --------
Ämne: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC: Via ferrata simplified
Datum: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 11:46:14 +0200
Från: egil <egil at riseup.net>
Svar till: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
<tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Till: tagging at openstreetmap.org
Hi
Den 09/03/2018 kl. 02:53 PM, skrev Richard:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 01:25:45PM +0200, egil wrote:
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Via_ferrata_simplified
> please not a completely new utterly incompatible with everything else
> proposal.
>
> Many elements of the old proposal are in use and rendered by several
> maps.
>
> While the old proposal is controversial, the plan has been to overcome
> much of the controversy by adding the possibility to tag ferratas as
> relation of type route=ferrata (added a few days ago).
>
> Why would you want to use route=hiking for ferrata if you can use
> route=ferrata? Do you want to deprecate via_ferrata_scale as well?
I responded to Richard here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Via_ferrata_simplified
Feel free to join the discussion.
Cheers
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/attachments/20180904/48141e78/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-at
mailing list