[Talk-at] Mapbox mapping activity

[Robert Grübler]

Hi,
Basically, I see the goal of improving data quality very positively. Some - perhaps many - of the issues will be clearly solved. But what about the cases of doubt? Mappers from other countries, e.g. Belarus [1], may come to a different assessment than local mappers. The horizon of experience is simply different.

I miss a clear statement that all cases of doubt should remain untouched.
In this context: Are the mappers paid? On the basis of issues dealt with or issues resolved?

Best regards,
Robert

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_Mapbox_Data_RAVE_team_work_on_receiving_feedback_from_OSM_users 



Am  Freitag, 15. April 2022 13:26 schrieb Sergey Beliamei via Talk-at [mailto:talk-at at openstreetmap.org]

> Hello from the Mapbox Team!
> From the middle of April 2022 our team is going to start a mapping project in Austria.
> As part of on-going work to improve the quality of OpenStreetMap data, our team is 
> planning to review a subset of the detections to better understand the type of issues, 
> and also fix any valid data issues directly in the OSM. We’re concentrating on road 
> mistakes to improve map condition. In Austria we plan to upload data once a week 
> to see and fix the latest mistakes in mapping after reviewing the 1st iteration.
> We would really appreciate your feedback, any questions you have about this project, 
> as well as local insights that you think will help us better understand the data.
> There's a link to our Github ticket to the related issue and a link to our page in OSM Wiki.

> Best regards,
> Member of Mapbox team,
> Sergey