[Talk-at] [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - spring:name

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 28. Dec 2020, at 00:09, Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner at gmx.at> wrote:
> 
> My conclusion is that what is tagged is actually the spring and the tap
> in the same location. This is the most common use case in my area as
> well (where the tap is often just a piece of pipe).


yes, a pipe with steady flow rather than a tap is also what I am used from springs, if it isn’t just some kind of pond.
name seems ok then.

Could you present some real world examples, ideally with photos, where this tag should be applied and name seems unsuitable?

Cheers Martin